a.
He uses techniques like sliding between scenes,
sometimes tears apart, but they always have something related to join them
together. He switches back and forth in time, not going straight
chronologically. He weaves other people’s stories in with his own.
b.
The voice is conversational. He tells stories
like he’s sitting across from me, reminiscing about the past. He uses informal
words like “newish” and seems to trust the reader with the intimate details. He
doesn’t make a big deal out of them, like he’s told it all before, and maybe he
has.
c.
Every time he slides to a new topic or scene he
creates the image of the scene. Like when he starts talking about living in Pittsburgh,
“I walked around my neighborhood with my guard up.” He gives us an image to
look at while he lays the big stuff on us, like the heavy amount of discrimination
and violence there was toward him because of his Jewish religion.
d.
There are five sections: an intro, a section on
getting started in journalism and the “newish” type of writing, a section about
how creative non-fiction became a focus, a section about starting the literary
journal, and then how he feels about the journal. The overall sections are
chronological through his life, but the stories within them often aren’t.
e.
I will take with me the idea of having an
overarching chronological work of non-fiction, but within the chronology, using
different times and parts of my life to build on each other by theme rather
than time-relation.
f.
Questions: How is this supposed to be a part of
a memoir? It seems way too condensed to be part of a memoir. What was a
defining nationwide occurrence that sparked the idea of Non-fiction being
worthwhile?
Great observations about technique!
ReplyDelete